logo

61 pages 2 hours read

Elephant Company: The Inspiring Story of an Unlikely Hero and the Animals Who Helped Him Save Lives in World War II

Nonfiction | Biography | Adult | Published in 2014

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Part 1, Chapters 13-16Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Part 1: “The Making of an Elephant Wallah”

Part 1, Chapter 13 Summary: “The Murder of Me”

Revealing an anti-authority streak, Williams hires an indigenous worker—banned by the company—with a reputation for instability and unreliability. Soon enough, this employee, Aung Kyaw, disappears after being sent on an errand to buy chickens and eggs for the camp. When he finally returns, empty-handed, Williams summons him to his office and questions him. Aung Kyaw provides no adequate explanation, so Williams insults him—“I did use every Burmese jungle expression at my command to tell him what I thought of him as a man”—before telling him rudely to “Clear out!” (119). Aung Kyaw does not obey the order. Instead, he pulls out a dagger and brandishes it as Williams charges at him. Williams is stabbed in the ribs; the wound is severe, but his lungs are luckily undamaged.

Aung Kyaw turns himself in to the authorities, while Williams feels ashamed of the incident. He thinks that “[i]f I had shown Aung Kyaw the sympathy and understanding that I prided myself on having for the elephants” (121), he would not have been injured. Thus, he attends the trial, which could lead to Aung Kyaw’s execution, to be an advocate rather than an adversary. He asks to take the Burmese oath in addition to the oath sworn on the Christian Bible before his testimony; then, he tells the story, claiming that Aung Kyaw’s actions were “never, he believed, premeditated” (123). Aung Kyaw is sentenced to serve three years in prison and served only one, and Williams visits him once he is released. His family prostrates themselves in front of Williams, “asking pity and forgiveness” (123). Williams replies that all has already been forgiven.

Part 1, Chapter 14 Summary: “Bandoola: Hero or Rogue?”

The author returns to finish the story begun in the first chapter: Bandoola has just helped to save Williams’s life, taking him across the violent Yu River as he is dying of malaria and the tropical disease, tinea sin wai, also known as “elephant itch” (125). However, it will take yet another miracle to save Williams entirely because he fears he will not survive the ten days it would take to get him to a doctor over land. Amazingly, some boats arrive near shore, and Williams is taken to Rangoon, where he is nursed back to health—fully healthy in time to return to his jungle post after the Christmas holiday.

He, his old boss Harding, his new boss Millie, and a young recruit named Tony make their way down the Chindwin River back to teak territory after Christmas. Revelries have been excessive, and Harding wakes his friend with a black velvet, “a potent half-and-half mix of champagne and stout” (127). Williams is to lead the great pack of elephants across the river, back to the jungle where logging work will resume. Harding is about to retire, and everyone acknowledges that Williams is now the most talented elephant man on the company payroll. The 35 elephants assembled finally plunge into the water, following a brave female—chosen not by the human wranglers but among themselves—and make it across without a hitch. Williams reflects that he is witnessing “another of life’s lessons from the elephants”: that “[d]ominance is not leadership” (129). All goes well, with no loss of beast or man—until, that is, Williams is notified of “a horrible message: Bandoola had killed his rider” (131).

Part 1, Chapter 15 Summary: “A Murder Investigation”

Williams is deeply disturbed by the murderous actions of Bandoola, who, unlike other elephants who accidentally kill a rider, shows absolutely no signs of remorse or fear of retribution. Williams undertakes the investigation himself, noting that Bandoola’s rider was an opium addict—though some of the other riders were, as well, and it had not seemed to bother the elephants. He also observes that Bandoola is consuming large amounts of food, but there is no trace of defecation; it occurs to him that “Bandoola had been starved” (134).

The foreman confirms Williams’s suspicions, saying that his rider had been too high to release Bandoola for foraging as was customary and that Po Toke had been too preoccupied with “domestic drama” emerging from his two wives (134). Williams himself had been overindulging in drink over the last several days. Thus, it is decided that “[t]he killing would not go in Bandoola’s official record” (135). However, the matter of Po Toke’s distraction remains unsettled, as Williams is “mystified” (135) by the usually competent elephant master.

Part 1, Chapter 16 Summary: “Rebels and Reunions”

The final chapter of Part 1 addresses the growing unrest within Burma, where a resistance movement has been growing into a full-scale rebellion. Indigenous Burmans agitate for an independent government and more control over their land and resources. Burma itself had been conquered by the British in stages, after three separate wars, and was relegated to the status of a mere “province of India” under British rule (139). The company for which Williams works was instrumental to this process, and Williams “was aware that working for a British firm made him a target” (137). In 1928, Williams is assigned to a new territory where rebel unrest is especially strong.

However, more important to Williams is a new population of elephants he needs to know and treat. He quickly “memorized their names” (139) and inoculated them with anthrax vaccine. Nevertheless, “life with elephants was risky” (139), and he is one day almost stampeded by one of the violent charges in his camp, Taw Sin Ma or “Miss Wild Elephant.” He escapes unscathed but cautious. He also notes the sensitivity of the elephants to their surroundings: one day, when the troupe should be out foraging, they all come back to camp and stand silently under the hot sun. Shortly after that, an earthquake strikes. The elephants then return to their foraging in the forest.

Burma appears to fall into the hands of the rebels, which results in a months-long work stoppage and economic distress. Still, Williams believes his uzis “would never abandon their elephants” (144). Williams is conscripted by the British to use his men and elephants to root out rebels in the forest, but they never come across any of note. Instead, the pack is trailed by what appears to be a wild bull who follows them on their journey through the forest. It turns out to be Bandoola, who has been missing for about a year (Williams suspects Po Toke had a hand in freeing him). The uzis bring Bandoola back to camp, and Williams keeps the elephant close, even after quashing the rebellion. While he keeps Po Toke on as Bandoola’s handler, he demotes him; the trust between them has been broken by Williams’s suspicion that Po Toke participated in the rebellion. By the end of the chapter, though, the resistance has been thoroughly trounced—its leader “captured, tried, and hanged” (147)—as Williams continues to achieve personal success. As the author puts it, “Billy Williams was finally, unmistakably, an elephant wallah” (147).

Part 1, Chapters 13-16 Analysis

These last four chapters of Part 1 are troubling, full of contentious encounters between European colonialists and Burmese natives, or between man and elephant—both reflecting symbolically on the other. The deadly or near-deadly encounters between man and elephant mirror the clashes between the imperial British overlords and the indigenous nationalist rebels. Bandoola’s transgressions—killing his rider/master and returning to the wild—are undoubtedly symbolic of the Burmese desire for independence: after all, the author admits, “as much as [Bandoola] liked Williams, he preferred his freedom” (145).

Chapter 13 recounts Williams's near-fatal encounter with a disobedient native, Aung Kyaw. The author relays the incident as an example of Williams’s mercy and how he has learned tolerance from the elephants. He defends his attacker in court, displaying his loyalty to the indigenous peoples by making an oath in the Burmese manner as well as the traditional English swearing-in, and generously forgives the man. Still, it is difficult not to read the incident as a narrative about the “white savior” whose generosity of spirit rescues the undeserving native or a cautionary tale about the white man who has “gone native.” Williams’s defiant hiring of the problematic Aung Kyaw certainly puts himself in harm’s way. With his English decency, he tries to give a clearly “ungrateful” native a second chance. There is also the troubling fact that the entire court proceedings “will be taken in English” (122), as ordered by the judge. The man on trial does not speak—or, one presumes, understand—English; thus, the proceedings themselves barely mask an imbalance of power that could easily lead to a miscarriage of justice.

The elephants’ activities symbolically reflect the growing agitation for freedom within the Burmese communities. When Williams successfully guides them across the river, the author describes the event as such: “The uzis rode, but they gave no commands—the animals were dictating events now. Captive elephants had transformed into wild ones, becoming just a little more majestic for it” (131). While the author herself does not explicitly make the connections, it seems clear that the self-determination of the elephants—and the literary tradition of comparing indigenous peoples to animal spirits—mirrors the desires of the Burmese people.

The final chapter in Part 1 is devoted almost solely to the rebellion. The author provides the reader with a short but detailed history of the British incursion into Burma: three wars were fought, at the end of which Britain ruled over the territory as it did much of Southeast Asia. She acknowledges that the Burmese people had many legitimate reasons to agitate for their independence, including “nationalist desires and rejection of taxation policies, as well as resentment over the restructuring of education in the country” (137). The simple but damning fact is that Britain controlled Burma's resources and the economy, keeping the indigenous peoples mired in poverty. Nevertheless, the author smoothly transitions to Williams’s personal successes in the face of these challenges—which are belittled by how quickly the problem of rebellion is dispatched, in just a couple of sentences. The author’s focus, instead, is on how the singular Williams had at last achieved “a level of expertise he had dreamed of for a decade” (147). His loyalty to the British also goes unquestioned, as “he would not support the nationalist movement over his own country” (147). This serves him and his country well as the next chapter of history unfolds.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 61 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools