57 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
It could easily be argued that this is a novel of theater: All of the characters in it are acting parts and playing roles. The conspiracy itself is redolent with plot and plot twists; the element of showmanship is embedded in the con; and the book itself begins with a visit to the theater, with Sue watching Oliver Twist and thinking the events portrayed on stage were, actually, real life. Indeed, when Sue visits Mrs. Sucksby in jail, as she is awaiting her execution, she brings her a “sugar mouse” to remind her of “the time she had put me in her bed and told me about Nancy from Oliver Twist” (478). Mrs. Sucksby had lied to Sue, telling her that Nancy was just fine, that she had taken an offer from “a nice chap from Wapping, who had set her up in a little shop selling sugar mice and tobacco” (5). Thus, the boundaries between theater and life, between acting and truth-telling, are constantly blurred and often violated.
Even the word “character” carries with it several meanings. It indicates a role in a play, of course, but it can also imply integrity, as when Gentleman asks Sue—while she’s playing the “character” of the lady’s maid—“And what is your character?” She responds immediately, “Honest as the day” (37). Later, it refers to a recommendation, as when Gentleman “wrote me out a character” (45), indicating a character reference from a former employer—which is, naturally, fabricated. Early in the conspiracy, when Sue thinks of Maud, she imagines her as a character in a particular role: “For though I knew her fate—though I knew it so well, I was helping to make it!—perhaps I knew it rather in the way you might know the fate of a person in a story or a play” (87). Sue cannot quite bring herself to believe in the reality of her actions, in the consequences of her acting/actions. Briar itself looks “like a house in a play” to her (139). For Sue, reality always contains some element of fakery; this is the consequence of her life with thieves and con-men. From the faux shillings that Gentleman passes along to the silver plate scrubbed of crests, Sue’s world has always been akin to a staged set.
She eventually comes to believe in the skill of Maud’s theatrical ability. When watching Maud and Gentleman together, she thinks, “if that wasn’t love, then I was a Dutchman” (95), though she later realizes Maud is merely afraid of Gentleman. Much later, after she knows the full truth of her betrayal, she screams at Maud, “You think that, in looking at you, I’m not seeing danger with a face—a false face, with an actress mouth—with lying blushed, and two brown treacherous eyes” (459). Maud herself admits “my mouth is an actress mouth” (460), though she wholly regrets her role by that point. By her own accounting, Sue is blessed with a “warm imagination” (6), and as most of the story is told through her first-person narration, the reader witnesses the dramatization of events as they theatrically unfold.
Hair functions as a symbol of sexuality and, conversely, demure innocence throughout the book. In Victorian society, in particular, no respectable woman would go out of the house without her hair pinned up in the style of the day (the pre-Raphaelite painters caused scandal with their pictures of women letting their hair flow loose and free); thus, concern over hair often doubles as a concern for female morality. When Gentleman shows Sue how to style her hair when acting as a lady’s maid, Sue protests that “I looked that plain and bacon-faced, [I] might have been trying for places in a nunnery” (32). Instead of the hard curls favored by the lower-class women of London, “too fast for a country lady” (31), Sue must wear her hair in a “plain knot” pinned up in back (31). Hair is not only sexual currency, but it is also financial currency. There is a thriving trade in selling hair for wigs and other items. When Sue first attends to Maud’s hair, she praises it: “Her hair was good, and very long let down. I brushed it, and held it, and thought what it might fetch” (77). In the world of thieves, hair is another form of “poke.”
In addition, hair symbolizes possession, ownership, and maternal care. For example, Mrs. Sucksby washes Sue’s hair with vinegar until it shines when she is young. When Maud leaves the psychiatric hospital as a child, the nurses—robbed of their own maternal offspring—tear at her hair in a frenzy, hoping to keep a piece of their plaything: “They reach and squabble over the falling tresses like gulls—their voices rousing the lunatics in their own close rooms, making them shriek” (169). It is a striking scene of violence, the desire to possess the innocence of this child among them. When Sue witnesses Mrs. Sucksby caring for Maud’s hair, it drives her wild with jealousy: “I’d see Maud [...] as if she knew I was watching, and mocked me! [...] And I saw Mrs. Sucksby, at night, letting it [her hair] down.—Once I saw her life a tress of it to her mouth, and kiss it” (447). The jealousy elicited here is ambiguous; it is both an envious reaction to Mrs. Sucksby’s maternal attentions and an implicitly sexual jealousy of the attentions paid to Maud’s hair by another. When Sue’s hair is mistreated in the psychiatric hospital—yanked out in tufts, sewn flat to her head—it weakens her, divests her of worth and beauty, and signifies her castoff status. The significance of female hair flows everywhere throughout the novel.
Like hair, Maud’s gloves represent (or repress) her sexuality and, conversely, her innocence. She is forced to wear gloves by her uncle, who is concerned more for the safety of his precious books than for the propriety of his much-abused niece. Still, the gloves maintain the superficial appearance of innocence. The first time Sue sees Maud without them, she notes her fragility: “Her hands were bare, she had her little white gloves laid neatly by, but she sat beside a shaded lamp, that threw all its light upon her fingers, and they seemed pale as ashes upon the page of print” (69). Maud appears vulnerable without her gloves, and Sue begins to feel protective toward her. Maud sleeps with “her hair put back” and her hands “inside their gloves” (204). This symbolizes her stifled sexuality, kept locked away in Briar, despite her worldly knowledge.
Indeed, when Sue witnesses Maud’s gloves “quite spoiled with paint” (107), she believes her plan with Gentleman is working. Her sullied gloves represent her smudged innocence as she inches her way toward consummating her affair with Gentleman (at least from Sue’s perspective). Sue is more certain that the conspiracy is working when she sees something even more sensual: “She let him kiss her. Not on her lips, but somewhere altogether better” (107). This is left to the reader’s imagination for an agonizing page until Sue relates exactly what she witnessed: “Then, while I stood watching, he lifted one of her weak hands and slowly drew the glove half from it; and then he kissed her naked palm” (108). Her protection has been penetrated, and Gentleman has symbolically sullied her innocence. As Sue puts it, “And by that, I knew he had her” (108). Even the weather agrees, as thunder sounds in the sky and “the rain began to fall, in great, dark, staining drops” (109). Maud is tainted—by her association with Gentleman, whether sexually, as Sue believes, or deceitfully, as Maud herself knows—and the storm is threatening, indeed.
Later in the book, Sue tucks away one of Maud’s gloves as a sentimental keepsake, thinking she will never see her again. In the psychiatric hospital, it becomes a synecdoche for Maud herself, as Sue tears at it and bites it, trying to harm the lover who has betrayed her. When she discovers the complete truth—that Mrs. Sucksby has been the villainous mastermind behind the entire plot—she is overcome with passionate sadness and “wept and wept over [her glove] as if my heart would break” (499). Shortly thereafter, Sue determines to find Maud herself—the glove will no longer suffice.
The ability to read and write, and literary pursuits in general, are fraught notions in the novel. Instead of aesthetic pleasure, Mr. Lilly’s library promises perversion and “poison;” overly literate women threaten society at large—a constantly contentious debate within Victorian society, historically speaking. It is notable that Maud, upon learning that Sue cannot read, finds it positively saintlike: “Not to read! It seems to me a kind of fabulous insufficiency—like the absence, in a martyr or saint, of the capacity for pain” (226). For that is all that her ability to read has brought Maud: pain, shame, humiliation, and captivity. Indeed, after she and Sue consummate their relationship, she feels resurrected: “I think I was dead, before. Now she has touched the life of me, the quick of me; she has put back my flesh and opened me up” (263). The Christ-like Sue, with her illiterate talents, has brought Maud back from the brink of spiritual death—though those hopes must be long-deferred before brought to fruition.
When Sue is imprisoned in the psychiatric hospital, the doctor assumes that literary pursuits cause her issues: “We have a name for your disease. We call it a hyper-aesthetic one. You have been encouraged to over-indulge yourself in literature; and have inflamed your organs of fancy” (394). Sue is flabbergasted by this diagnosis, knowing that she cannot read. But Dr. Christie’s opinions are firm, and Sue must write her way out of her predicament; he will not consider her cured until she can write like the secretary he has been told she is. Maud’s literacy leaves her imprisoned at Briar, while Sue’s illiteracy leaves her imprisoned in the psychiatric hospital.
Once the two lovers are at last reunited, Maud is pursuing the questionable profession of writing pornographic material—after all, she has the expertise and the skill—to Sue’s fleeting chagrin. She notes that Maud’s hands “were bare,” but they “did not tremble” (507). They were “marked [...] with spots and smudges of ink” (507). Her innocence is gone, but so is her period of imprisonment; Maud is proud of her work, unashamed of her bare hands. She may be smudged with the ink of her graphic tales, but this no longer signifies depravity or disgrace—Sue acknowledges it “was only ink” (511)—but rather represents personal empowerment and sexual liberation. In the end, literacy engenders liberty.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Sarah Waters
Historical Fiction
View Collection
LGBTQ Literature
View Collection
Mothers
View Collection
Mystery & Crime
View Collection
Popular Book Club Picks
View Collection
Pride Month Reads
View Collection
Romance
View Collection
Sexual Harassment & Violence
View Collection
The Booker Prizes Awardees & Honorees
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection
Victorian Literature
View Collection
Victorian Literature / Period
View Collection