56 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
In Love’s Labour’s Lost, William Shakespeare examines the value and legitimacy of the masculine pursuit of love. The initial oath sworn by the men devalues the pursuit of love compared to pious intellectual pursuit. However, Berowne argues against this, and later all four Lords commit to the notion that pursuing love should be their paramount aim. Berowne suggests that love is the most valuable type of knowledge, arguing that women “are the books, the arts, the academes / That show, contain, and nourish all the world” (4.3.346-47). Shakespeare leans into the romantic idea central to many of his works that love enriches and inspires.
The four Lords embody a masculine pursuit of love typical of the literary and theatrical conventions of the period: They write sonnets and gift the women tokens of their affection. They hyperbolize the beauty of the women they are pursuing, and the way this love has altered their lives. For example, in the sonnets they read in 4.3, Berowne highlights the absurdity of Dumaine and Longaville’s heightened language, describing a romantic ideal to which a real person could never live up: “This is the liver vein, which makes flesh a deity” (4.3.74-75). However, this is laden with dramatic irony, as he uses the same hyperbolic divine imagery about Rosaline in his own sonnet, “celestial as thou art” (4.2.142). Despite their heightened language, the women are not convinced that the poems are meant seriously, and Holofernes describes Berowne’s poetry as imitative and shallow, an example of form over substance (4.2.150-51). Shakespeare satirizes the Lords’ reliance on conventions in their pursuit of love, suggesting they lean on heightened, formulaic ideas about romance that may represent a performance of love rather than truly meaningful connection.
Shakespeare suggests that this pursuit of love centers on masculine self-expression rather than the women themselves. In her first appearance, the Princess tells Boyet that he is only praising her to show off his own rhetorical and poetic skill: “[You are] much willing to be counted wise / In spending your wit in the praise of mine” (4.2.18-19). In 4.2, the women successfully exploit the Lords’ emphasis on conventional tokens of love to trick them into swearing to the wrong person. This suggests that the Lords are more interested in a romantic ideal than the individual person they claim to love: They swear fidelity to whichever masked figure they see with their token, without questioning who she is.
Shakespeare suggests that Lords pursue love as a projection of their own identity as a lover seeking a prize. Berowne acknowledges this dynamic: “[F]or men’s sake, the authors of these women / Or women’s sake, by whom we men are men” (4.3.354-55). He suggests that the masculine pursuit of love defines them as men; as the men are “authors,” the women are defined as objects shaped by the men’s projection of this process onto them.
However, the play’s ending subverts this idea, showing that the women exist as people beyond the men’s pursuit of them. The Princess’s grief over her father’s death supersedes her role playing the love interest—she is no longer able or willing to indulge the King in his romantic wordplay, telling him she must leave. The challenges that all four women set the men demand that they pursue love in a way that is not defined by their own terms, but by the women instead. This open ending leaves potential for the expected happy ending: Shakespeare still promotes the masculine pursuit of love, but he suggests that it may not follow an idealized, conventional narrative.
The complexity of language is central to Love’s Labour’s Lost. Shakespeare celebrates the potential offered by language, but also uses it to encapsulate the challenge of truly understanding another person.
Shakespeare partly does this through humor, of two different types. Firstly, many characters engage in intentional misunderstandings and miscommunication to produce complex wordplay, such as the Katherine and Boyet in Act II, or Mote teasing Armado. Secondly, characters such as Costard, Armado, and Holofernes are constantly misunderstanding accidentally, creating a verbal equivalent of slapstick. Shakespeare shows that the complexity of language can be used for humor and social bonding, but can also create genuine gulfs in understanding.
Shakespeare also explores this theme through a more serious lens. The complexity of language fails the Lords: Despite their efforts writing in poetic verse, the women do not take their suits seriously, which is made apparent by the sudden change in atmosphere following the Princess’s father’s death. The men and women are inhabiting different realities, which language has failed to cross or has even partially created: The Princess even tells the King, “I understand you not” (5.2.826). Berowne tries to rectify this by resolving to speak more simply, but he uses rhyming verse to swear not to use rhyme anymore (5.2.441). Shakespeare uses this dramatic irony to show the challenge of seeking to escape the constraints of language and the conventions associated with it, such as love poetry within the masculine pursuit of love.
However, Shakespeare also shows that the complexity of language can effectively convey complex ideas and enhance human connection. Berowne challenges the conventional language of love through which the other Lords seek to quantify Rosaline against the women they are pursuing, saying that she redefines beauty standards: “[H]er favor turns the fashion of the days” (4.3.282). He still engages with the conventional framework for verbalizing beauty, but he adapts it to fit Rosaline rather than vice versa, acknowledging her as an individual person rather than an abstract ideal of romance.
Shakespeare also uses Rosaline’s challenge to Berowne in the final scene to suggest that the complexity of language is not just an obstacle to overcome, but also a tool that can be used for human connection: She asks him to use his skill with words to bring joy to suffering people. Shakespeare suggests that the complexity of language offers both pitfalls and possibilities; it has the power to confuse and constrain, but also to create meaningful communication between people.
The tensions between fantasy and reality are explored in Love’s Labour’s Lost, bringing together many of the play’s key ideas. Shakespeare explores how people create fantasy and how this fantasy interconnects with reality both in the masculine pursuit of love and through the complexity of language.
Make-up is mentioned throughout the play as a vehicle for discussing Fantasy Versus Reality. It was popular in the Elizabethan court, and the men stress that while it creates great beauty, this is a temporary fantasy: Berowne attacks the women other than Rosaline by saying, “Your mistresses dare never come in rain / For fear their colors should be washed away” (4.3.290-91). They judge this fantastical beauty to be less valuable than reality. However, Shakespeare exposes their own role in creating this fantasy of an ideal woman, as all the Lords buy into it, and even create it, as they hyperbolize the women’s beauty and project idealized versions of themselves as poetic lovers in their sonnets. Longaville, for example, asks, “[W]hat fool is not so wise / To lose an oath to win a paradise” (4.3.72-73), elevating himself through his depiction of Maria.
Shakespeare suggests that the Lords’ presentations of themselves in their sonnets are fantastical using irony: They all grapple with the oxymoron that in swearing fidelity, they all break an oath. He suggests that their oath was fantastical in the first place, ignoring the reality of their political obligations. Their oath buys into a masculine romantic fantasy in which the only role women are assigned is as their love interests. Shakespeare shows that they have to face reality as the Princess’s arrival in a diplomatic capacity immediately forces them all to break the oaths.
He also presents their overall goal as a fantasy: They seek to overcome death by achieving fame, representing a type of immortality. This was a popular subject in Elizabethan literature, including in Shakespeare’s sonnets. However, the play’s ending proves that death is inescapable: The Princess’s father’s death brings an abrupt halt to all proceedings, leaving the narrative suspended. He also uses the device of a play within a play, a common feature in Elizabethan drama, in the theatrical staging of the Nine Worthies. This set piece draws its humor from the juxtaposition of the noble, mythical figures being presented with the ordinary, flawed performers, who frequently make mistakes, making it impossible for their audience to suspend their disbelief. The descent of the performance into chaos comically highlights the gulf between the temporary fantasy of theatre and the real world that must ultimately prevail.
The performance of the Worthies is a microcosm for Shakespeare’s meta-theatrical examination of Love’s Labour’s Lost itself. He draws attention to its status as a piece of fiction through irony, as Berowne promises never to recite pre-penned speeches again (5.2.438)—something the actor is doing in that moment. Shakespeare also uses common tropes in Elizabethan literature throughout the play more generally, as the Lords buy into fantastical popular narratives, including in their masculine pursuit of love. These fantasies are a source of enjoyment for the characters, who dance, flirt, and play games: Shakespeare celebrates the meaning and connection that fantasy can offer, often through the complexity of language.
However, in the final Act, Love’s Labour’s Lost abruptly subverts its own genre, as the neat, happy ending it has built toward is deferred, with Berowne explicitly noting, “Our wooing doth not end like an old play” (5.2.547). Shakespeare dismantles the fantasy of the play to suggest that reality is more complex, and that it can only temporarily be escaped through theatre. Nonetheless, the play does not become a tragedy: He leaves the ending open, suggesting that life continues afterwards, and offering a note of optimism about the characters’ romantic unions.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By William Shakespeare
Appearance Versus Reality
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
British Literature
View Collection
Comedies & Satirical Plays
View Collection
Laugh-out-Loud Books
View Collection
Marriage
View Collection
Romance
View Collection
Truth & Lies
View Collection
Valentine's Day Reads: The Theme of Love
View Collection