logo

72 pages 2 hours read

Spare

Nonfiction | Autobiography / Memoir | Adult | Published in 2023

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Consequences of Press Harassment and Misinformation

Lack of privacy and the insidious impact of press intrusion is a constant theme in Spare. Prince Harry compares life as a royal to living in a “surreal fishbowl” (92). The press feels entitled to intrude and comment on every area of his life, from speculation over his paternity to snide allusions to his lack of academic promise. From the moment photographers snap Prince Harry viewing tributes to his mother the day after her death, Spare conveys the stressful sensation of being under constant public scrutiny.

Prince Harry emphasizes the amoral tactics of the press as they pursue headlines. He illustrates how some stories (such as his drug use) are based on rumor, while others (e.g., the “gold-plated” portaloos supposedly hired for his wedding) are completely fabricated. For Prince Harry, the circumstances of his mother’s death, when paparazzi chased Princess Diana and took photographs of her dying, exemplify the media’s ruthless aggression. It’s also embodied in Rupert Murdoch’s media empire, which uses misinformation and intrusive practices such as illegal phone tapping. Prince Harry illustrates the devastating consequences of phone hacking by referencing the case of murdered teenager Milly Dowler. By hacking into Milly’s voicemail after her death, News of the World reporters led her parents to falsely believe that she was still alive.

Spare depicts the psychological effects of being publicly reviled and ridiculed by the press. Harry experiences sadness and anxiety, and consistently negative press leads Meghan to thoughts of suicide. While Harry primarily blames the media, he suggests that the public is complicit because it craves such stories, observing, “Of all human biases, ‘negativity bias’ is the most indelible” (219).

The memoir reveals Prince Harry’s recurring frustration about the Palace’s symbiotic relationship with the press. The royal family rarely makes official complaints about its behavior and often actively cooperates with the press. Prince Harry suggests that Prince Charles is preoccupied with gaining positive publicity, having endured negative press, particularly after the death of Princess Diana. However, the author’s observation that his father “hated their hate, but […] loved their love” (396) could equally characterize his own relationship with the media.

As Harry’s therapist points out, his fixation with the press is obsessive, and he compulsively reads everything written about him. Prince Harry’s decision to tell his story through his memoir—and through his media interviews—demonstrates a desire to, like his father, redress his public image. However, unlike his father, he does so without the formal support of the royal family.

The Monarchy as an Institution and Machine

Throughout Spare are numerous references to “the Palace.” While the phrase suggests a single entity, it’s a metonym describing the entire royal institution, from the royal family to a complex network of courtiers and advisors. Prince Harry’s memoir depicts the Palace as a well-oiled yet ruthless machine that works for the institution’s good while often sacrificing the happiness of its individuals.

Prince Harry demonstrates the monarchy as an institution built on maintaining protocol and historical precedent. Employing metaphors of death—such as “[w]e christened and crowned, graduated and married, passed out and passed over our beloveds’ bones” (399)—the author emphasizes how the royal family’s ancestry shapes and defines its members. The memoir compares the experience of being confined by these parameters to the encasement of the Crown Jewels in the Tower of London. Spare suggests that the Palace values protocol and historical precedence because they’re the monarchy’s main defense in a world that increasingly questions its validity.

Railing against the workings of the Palace, Spare highlights how the machine overrides personal relationships and human emotions. Prince Harry outlines the long-lasting effects of being forced to repress his grief and make public appearances immediately after his mother’s death. In addition, he highlights how lengthy bureaucracy impacts personal events as he waits for “the nebulous upper regions of the royal decision-making apparatus” (327) to tell him when and where he can get married (327). Toward the memoir’s end, Prince Harry illustrates how the machine affects personal communications when he attempts to arrange a private discussion with his grandmother about his future. Facing obstructions from the Queen’s courtiers, he ultimately feels that the machine, not his family, decides his fate.

In Part 3, Harry explores what founded—and what maintains—the British monarchy. Although in the 21st century it’s debatable whether the royal family benefits or costs the people of the United Kingdom, as it’s funded by taxpayers but also pays a significant amount of tax itself, Harry acknowledges that the monarchy is a system built on inequality. The institution “rest[s] upon lands obtained and secured when the system was unjust and wealth was generated by exploited workers and thuggery, annexation and enslaved people” (385).

The rewards that the monarchy reaped from these unjust activities have been passed down through the generations, helping maintain the family’s wealth and status. Just as the Tower of London “was held together with the blood of animals” (399), so the monarchy is sustained by wealth and power it gained at the expense—and through the exploitation—of others. By drawing attention to the raw truth of the royal family’s origins, Harry suggests that the institution may never be able to fully modernize, given that the traditions and privileges that have served it so well continue to shape it.

Royal Family Dynamics and Conflict

Prince Harry describes the British monarchy as “one very large, very ancient, very dysfunctional family” (399). His memoir illustrates the royal family’s commonalities with “ordinary” families, their differences, and how the unique pressures of being royal often intensify family conflict.

As the memoir’s title suggests, Prince Harry’s relationship with his older brother, Prince William, is central to the narrative. In recounting his competitiveness, arguments, and physical altercations with Prince William, the author could be describing the sibling rivalry in any family. However, the dynamic between the brothers is exacerbated by their royal roles as “Heir” and “Spare.” Resentments arise on both sides because Prince William has greater privileges, while Prince Harry faces fewer restrictions on his conduct.

Likewise, royal status complicates Prince Harry’s relationships with his father, stepmother, and grandmother. His hostility toward Camilla as “the Other Woman” (39) reflects children’s natural emotions when their parents separate. However, Harry’s resentment is heightened by his belief that Camilla is engaged in a publicity campaign “aimed at marriage and eventually the Crown” (40).

In Prince Harry’s relationship with his father, both struggle to connect because they have wildly different temperaments. However, a greater cause of antagonism is Prince Charles’s patriarchal role, requiring him to fund his adult sons and allocate their duties. When his father cuts off his royal funds, Prince Harry expresses profound frustration at how he was infantilized and then abandoned, declaring:

Pa didn’t financially support Willy and me, and our families, out of any largesse. That was his job […]. We agreed to […] surrender our autonomy, keep our hands and feet inside the gilded cage at all times, and in exchange the keepers of the cage agreed to feed and clothe us (319-20).

Similarly, as well as being his grandmother, the Queen is Prince Harry’s “Commander.” He requires her permission for everything from proposing marriage to where he’s allowed to live. The existence of their dual private and public roles inevitably places an emotional distance between family members.

Royal life dictates not only the physical distance between the royal family and the public but also among the members of the royal family. As an example of how the “buffer zone” extends to their private lives, Prince Harry notes how he often has the urge to hug his grandmother but knows that it’s “[o]ut of the question” (78) because protocol forbids it. The author humorously highlights his family’s lack of physical intimacy with one another when he describes the reactions of his brother and father when Harry returned from Afghanistan:

I think Willy hugged me. I think I gave Pa a kiss on each cheek. He might also have…squeezed my shoulder? It would’ve appeared […] a normal family gathering and interaction, but for us, it was a flamboyant, unprecedented demonstration of physical affection (153).
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 72 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools