58 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Although lower-class women joined the workforce in greater numbers during the Industrial Revolution, the rise of the middle class meant that many women had more free time than ever before. As a result, standards for this class of women were quickly established in order to outline and control their role in society. Conduct books—which were usually written by men—aimed to teach women how to conduct themselves properly according to the new expectations and social conventions of the era. These texts outlined how a woman should fill her leisure time and dictated the details of proper behavior in both public and private spheres. Such publications also described how a woman should manage her household and cautioned her to avoid any speech, behavior, or company that might cause embarrassment to herself or her husband. In 1854, Coventry Patmore published a poem called “The Angel in the House,” in which he describes the devotion of his self-effacing and angelically pure wife and praises her as the ideal woman. This description became the model for all middle- and upper-class women during Queen Victoria’s reign.
Although Audrey Blake’s novel is set in the decade prior to the publication of Patmore’s poem, references to this feminine ideal appear throughout. In one early scene, Nora tells Mrs. Phipps that Daniel, like most conventional men, “believes women belong in a separate sphere” (68). The narrator goes on to explain that the idea of “separate spheres was a common subject of sermons, lectures, and newspaper articles. Women, as the morally superior gender, were made for ‘sweet ordering,’ for instilling Christian principles in children and comforting weary men” (68). Essentially, women were confined to the domestic arena and compelled to occupy themselves with tending their homes, inspiring their children, and comforting their husbands with their innate goodness. Virginia Woolf summarizes the “angel” as “intensely sympathetic […,] immensely charming […, and] utterly unselfish.” Woolf also evinces a derisive attitude toward this Victorian ideal, claiming that the angel “sacrificed herself daily” and “never had a mind or a wish of her own, but preferred to sympathize always with the minds and wishes of others” (Woolf, Virginia. “Professions for Women.” Literature Cambridge). This concern with a woman’s “purity” is reflected in the novel with Vickery’s condemnation of Nora’s presence during Prescott’s surgery. Vickery points out that Nora was in “such close proximity to [Prescott’s] reproductive organs” as to be scandalous (288), prompting Nora to defend her choice to prioritize Prescott’s life over her modesty. To Victorian society, however, Nora’s choice is indecent and shocking. Most people at the meeting and many others condemn her for stepping out of her proper sphere and exhibiting so little concern for modesty. Likewise, Mae calls Nora “brazen,” and an herb seller says that Croft’s home is a “house of disrepute” (318). As the story unfolds, Nora’s character is called into question when she refuses to follow convention, even when her refusal results from a desire to help someone else. Ultimately, Nora’s noncompliance with social expectations—her failure to be “the angel in the house” and give up her work in the clinic—leads to her alienation from English society. Despite Nora’s talent and skill, the strength of Patmore’s “angel” and the importance that Victorian English society places on female modesty compel her to leave the country and seek greater freedom in Italy.
Although The Girl in His Shadow is a work of historical fiction, many of the diseases and medicines to which it refers are accurate. As in the text, England experienced its first cholera outbreak in 1831, and due to other diseases like smallpox and tuberculosis, one’s “average life expectancy at birth was low: in 1850 it was 40 for men and 42 for women” (“Victorians: Food and Health.” English Heritage). Doctors had little understanding of the causes of infection or how to treat such maladies. The notion that “miasma” caused disease held that breathing foul air made people sick, and this “‘miasmatic’ explanation […] [figured] prominently in the long debates among the people who were responsible for combating the cholera epidemics that afflicted Britain […] between 1831 and 1866” (Halliday, Stephen. “Death and Miasma in Victorian London: An Obstinate Belief.” BMJ, 2001, vol. 323, no. 7327, pp. 1469-1471). In reality, cholera is caused by polluted water due to poor sanitation, but this hypothesis wasn’t accepted until nearly 30 years after the first outbreak. Germ theory did not exist until Louis Pasteur’s experiments in the 1860s, and the first antibiotic was manufactured in 1928. Therefore, Croft’s theory that a patient’s sepsis was caused by the wound’s exposure to pig dung is prescient, as is his certainty that cauterization would have done nothing to prevent this complication. History reveals that people like Croft are necessary to medical advancement, just as it suggests that egotistical, traditional practitioners like Silas Vickery are deeply detrimental. As a result, some of Croft’s more objectionable practices, such as his willingness to purchase corpses from graverobbers, could arguably be justified by the contribution that such practices make to Western medicine; Vickery, on the other hand, is cast as decidedly unlikeable and is accordingly condemned by history for eschewing innovative procedures, treatments, and ideas.
Another historically accurate element of the text’s discussion of medicine is the discovery and use of new anesthetics. Chloroform was invented in 1831 and became popular for use in surgeries due to its narcotic effect. About 15 years later, ether’s effects in a medical setting were publicly demonstrated after medical students who attended “ether frolics” noted that people under its influence were insensible to pain (“The Art of Anesthesia.” Science Museum). Harry alludes to this practice of inhaling ether to become intoxicated when he denounces the substance as a party drug rather than a serious anesthetic. Chloroform remained more widely used in England, especially after Queen Victoria popularized its use in childbirth. Ether can cause a person to cough and choke violently, an effect that Croft reports when he observes a dental patient’s response to the drug, and this is another reason why it was given up in favor of chloroform in England.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
Books on Justice & Injustice
View Collection
Books that Feature the Theme of...
View Collection
British Literature
View Collection
Canadian Literature
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Common Reads: Freshman Year Reading
View Collection
Education
View Collection
Health & Medicine
View Collection
Mortality & Death
View Collection
Romance
View Collection