logo

45 pages 1 hour read

The River

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 2019

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Human Versus Natural Threats

Danger from both natural and human sources looms pervasively throughout the novel. The forest fire, the violence of the whitewater, and the presence of predators such as bears all pose threats that are natural in a wilderness setting. Pierre—and the violence that he represents—is a uniquely human threat that has its source in greed and envy.

As an example of a natural threat, the narrative recounts a solo blueberry foraging excursion that Wynn makes early in the trip. He encounters a bear, and when he notices that she has cubs with her, the situation becomes intense: “Wynn’s heart jumped because he suddenly knew how much danger he was in” (105). The standoff with the bear ends innocuously, an irony given that Wynn is instead killed by a human in the novel’s climactic moments. Another natural threat is the fire, which wreaks massive destruction as it incinerates the forest, leaving behind a hellish landscape. Somehow, Jack, Wynn, and Maia survive the fire, mainly because of a combination of quick thinking and luck. After surviving the fire, Jack and Wynn, with Maia, paddle to beyond the fire’s edge and eventually find themselves again in a verdant landscape:

Being at this edge was like standing at the high-tide line of a tsunami. Looking out over the wreckage and death. The sense that you could turn around and walk away into the hills, and life. It might not be that simple with a homicidal freak downstream, but for now the sun was shining and the day was warming and they would have fish for supper (205).

Their escape from the fire should offer more than just a passing sense of relief, but it doesn’t because as much as the wilderness poses threats, so do humans in the story. In addition to Pierre’s shadowy presence is JD’s attempt to rape Maia, which begins with his peering into her tent: “[JD] turned his head to the tent more than once and Jack had the strong impression that it wasn’t just because he had burning questions. There was a young woman lying in there, however injured. That’s the sense Jack got” (222). The implication here is that the heavily drinking JD has nefarious intentions toward Maia. The threat of human violence in the novel is unceasing and parallels the dangers of the wilderness setting.

The novel suggests that violence and death is as much part of existence as beauty and grace. It also implies that in a primitive environment, human instinct returns to its primal nature so that it mimics its natural environment. Survival in the face of danger trumps morality and ethics. In addition, despite the threats faced by the characters and all the possible ways they could have been killed by natural threats in the wilderness, humans cause the deaths of Pierre and Wynn, suggesting that though humans have evolved into rational beings, they’re not all that far removed from their animal nature.

Survival

Of the two protagonists, Jack is the one who’s more in tune with the instinct for survival. Jack can anticipate danger because he can sense it before it happens, much as the animals do as the fire encroaches. After circling back to the place where they estimated Maia would be, Jack senses that something’s not right:

He could feel it on the back of his neck, almost the way the hair prickles and rises just before a lightning storm in the Never Summers back home. Just before he stepped into a Montana clearing straight into the glare of a grizzly. He’d always had it, that sixth sense—some people do—and he thought it had saved his bacon more than once (23).

Jack’s ability to anticipate danger in this way helps him and Maia survive. Because Jack senses danger as he does, he responds accordingly. His animal instincts take over, as many examples illustrate, beginning with his decision to go on the offensive and shoot Pierre before Pierre can shoot them: “Instinctively he knew they could not play defense, not the way they had the night before on the lake. They needed to go on the attack” (109). The morality of killing Pierre is a secondary consideration for Jack compared to his own will to survive. In Jack’s view—and considering the circumstances—reason and ethics can spell death.

Often in the novel, Jack is described as a hunter, and he not only can see evidence of his prey but also has the ability to stalk it. Just before they see Pierre waiting for them with his shotgun loaded and ready, Jack and Wynn are “[c]rouched in twilight like two predators” (133). Jack uses stealth to hunt his prey. After Wynn inadvertently slips, causing Pierre to shoot at them, Jack fires back and then takes off “[r]unning down the slope and looking for the kill as he would an elk” (135). The confrontation with Pierre demonstrates that the best chance for survival in the wilderness is to go on the offensive, becoming the predator rather than the prey.

After Pierre steals all their food, Wynn and Jack resort to doing whatever it takes to survive, which means killing what they can. Again, animal instinct takes precedence over rules of etiquette and civilized behavior. As an example, when Jack and Wynn go fishing earlier in the novel, the activity is leisurely, and they let many fish go. After Pierre steals (or dumps) their food, however, their appetites turn primal. Now they “dangle the small fish by the tail and strip the meat off the bones with their teeth” (150). In addition, Jack manages to grab hold of a caribou calf that’s struggling to swim across the river without its mother. He hauls it into the canoe and kills it with his bare hands. In the face of starvation and other calamities, survival depends on instinct rather than loftier, more civilized concerns.

Appearance Versus Reality

Throughout the novel, things aren’t always what they seem at first glance. Characters perceive a circumstance and form an opinion of that circumstance, but often there’s a disconnect between this perception and what’s really true. An early example of this is Wynn and Jack’s first encounter with the Texans. Vulgar and drunk, the men leave both Jack and Wynn feeling uneasy. Later in the novel, when the men reappear, even though Brent expresses gratitude and appreciation, Jack still doesn’t completely trust him. The impression from their first encounter compelled Jack to form a negative view of the men.

However, Jack watches the men prepare their camp and recognizes that “[t]he men were no fools. Nothing like Jack had thought on the first encounter on the lake. They made a big meal with wordless efficiency” (219). The way they’d appeared to Jack during that first encounter didn’t accurately reflect their aptitude in the wilderness. Furthermore, after Brent shoots Wynn, Jack recognizes the fault in his assumptions about Brent. He considers that Brent is likely a decent man who was adhering to a code of frontier justice when firing to prevent the theft of the canoe. In hindsight, Jack respects this. As it turns out, Brent isn’t the kind of man that Jack initially perceived him to be.

Conversely, Brent is suspicious of Jack and Wynn when he first sees the injured Maia with them. He thinks that Jack and Wynn may have killed her husband and kidnapped and done terrible things to her. Her presence at the camp gives an appearance of wrongdoing that doesn’t align with what’s really transpiring. Jack tries to contradict Brent’s assumptions, saying, “It’s not what you think” (217). However, Brent remains suspicious until their story begins to make sense enough for him to accept it.

A tension pervades the interactions between the Texans and Jack and Wynn that stems from mistrust. This suspicion derives from a faulty understanding of the other party because of how they appear to each other. In the novel’s climactic scene, it appears to Brent that both Wynn and Jack are stealing the boat, when in fact Wynn objects to the theft of the canoe. Of all four of the characters, Wynn is the most likely to attempt to verify—before acting—that what appears as one thing is actually that thing. His reluctance to presume Pierre’s guilt is an example. When they sneak up on Pierre at the first portage landing and Jack sees it as a chance to once and for all eliminate the threat he poses, Wynn objects. Wynn is a deliberate individual, and while Jack sees him as sometimes naive, Wynn often attempts to bridge the divide between appearances and reality and ensure that they match up. This makes Wynn’s death all the more tragically ironic.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 45 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools