logo

48 pages 1 hour read

Undefeated: Jim Thorpe and the Carlisle Indian School Football Team

Nonfiction | Biography | Middle Grade | Published in 2017

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

Sportsmanship as a Life Philosophy

The concept of sportsmanship is associated with how a player, team, and/or coach acts when winning and losing a particular game. One is a “good sport” if they are humble in victory and gracious in defeat while a “bad sport” acts out and snubs their opponent, perhaps even making excuses or blaming others for their loss. Having good sportsmanship means respecting oneself and one’s team and giving one’s full effort, regardless of the circumstances. The theme of sportsmanship in Undefeated touches on this aspect of the term as it recounts the many games played by Thorpe and the Carlisle Indian School football team, the hard work and dedication they put into practicing, and the determination that helps them bounce back from their losses. The book also demonstrates that sportsmanship is much more than one’s conduct on the field when winning or losing. Sportsmanship is a life philosophy that Thorpe used to help him overcome all the adversities he faced in life, not just in his athletic endeavors.

Thorpe’s legacy in American culture and athletics is about his psychological approach to being an athlete off as well as on the field. Undefeated portrays Thorpe as a man of few words, which is consistent with how the media, friends, and family also discussed Thorpe throughout the years. Yet when he does speak, he is quoted as being humble and gracious despite his own self-confidence. When, for instance, Sweden’s King Gustav places Thorpe’s gold medals around his neck, he says to Thorpe, “Sir…you are the greatest athlete in the world,” to which Thorpe simply replies, “Thanks, King” (178). In another instance of Thorpe’s understanding of sportsmanship as a life philosophy, Sheinkin writes of Thorpe’s teammate, Pete Calac, who said of Thorpe, “He was my idol […] he was the idol of every Indian boy […] Jim never acted like he was better than any of us, in spite of his great fame […]. He always just tried to be one of the guys” (186). These descriptions do not undermine the confidence Thorpe had in his own abilities. Instead, they reveal that Thorpe embodied what his father said to him before he left for the Carlisle Indian Industrial School: “Son, you are an Indian […] I want you to show other races what an Indian can do” (97).

Thorpe showed that Indigenous people could be much more than how the stereotypes of white American culture depicted them. Thorpe approached athletics with unmatched confidence, but he also showed that an Indigenous person could be humble and gracious, kind and generous, which are attributes of a true sportsman. Thorpe understood that he was an example even before he became famous. He understood that every game he played, people were waiting for him to prove their stereotypes correct, and he adopted sportsmanship as a life philosophy to show others how true winners behave because winning and losing are a very small part of being an athlete.

Exploitation of Indigenous People

Exploitation is the practice of treating another person or people unfairly in order to benefit from them. Exploitation of Indigenous peoples in the United States is a prevalent theme throughout Undefeated because Sheinkin foregrounds the historical context of Thorpe’s story in which white America actively discriminated against Indigenous people and sought to wipe out Indigenous culture.

Thorpe and his teammates on the Carlisle Indian Industrial School football team proudly represented their school and made the sacrifices that serious athletes make to focus on their training. It is up for debate, though, whether Pratt and Warner, both of whom benefitted from the team’s hard work and sacrifice, actually had the best interests of their Indigenous students in mind when they pushed them to play more games and beat the highest caliber of competition from schools like Harvard, Princeton, and the University of Pennsylvania. Pratt’s goal was to prove that his school could civilize its students, and he saw the team’s victories as a reflection of his success in stripping them of their Indigenous traits rather than as the result of their intrinsic talents, skills, and capacity for hard work. Pratt’s school received increased revenue from ticket sales and attention from major press organizations. With his paternalistic attitude toward Indigenous people, Pratt had no problem using his students to promote his values and reputation as an educational reformer. The legacy of the Carlisle Indian School attests that it did far more harm than good for its students and their families, but Pratt never questioned the ethics of his method.

Though Warner went on to have a stellar coaching career, his real fame began when he became the coach of the winning Carlisle Indian School football team. The fact that Warner left the school and came back to coach Thorpe suggests that he believed his team’s performance would reflect on his career and his legacy, and he only wanted to coach the team if they were going to win. Warner had what he called “football intelligence,” which is demonstrated in the plays and other innovations he invented for the game while coaching the Carlisle Indian School football team. He was, however, only able to coach his team to the degree that he could because of the high caliber of players and individuals he had wearing his school uniform. While the wins certainly benefited Thorpe and his teammates, Warner’s demands often pushed them past exhaustion, and they, rather than Warner, bore the blame for their losses. In this light, it becomes possible to see Warner as exploiting the team for his own benefit, as the years went by and the school became stronger in football and more well-known across the nation.

Warner was paid $4,000 per year (roughly $120,000 in 2023) to coach the Carlisle Indian School football team, an unbelievable amount during that time in the United States. Before arriving at Carlisle, Warner had squandered any small sums he’d made from coaching when he gambled. It can’t be known for certain, but Warner may have not wanted to risk his position by defending Thorpe when he was accused of illegally playing semi-professional baseball and lying about it to compete in the Olympics. Both Warner and Friedman claimed to have known nothing about Thorpe’s summer baseball playing though they were well aware that he, like many other college athletes, played semiprofessional baseball in the summer. It is possible to say that they hung Thorpe out to dry to protect themselves, their salaries, and their reputations.

Instances like these, among many other instances throughout the book, point to the very real aspect of early 20th-century American racism and exploitation. Though the Carlisle school was supposed to prepare its students to enter the mainstream American workforce, its graduates continued to face racism and, thus, unemployment because white society was still too racist to hire them as skilled workers. In their paternalism, neither Pratt nor Friedman saw society as the problem; they only intensified efforts to strip Carlisle’s students of their Indigenous traits, believing Indigenous people were intrinsically flawed rather than subject to an unfair system.

Outside the school, exploitation of Indigenous people determined when and if they could be considered American. At the time, Indigenous people were not considered American citizens though Thorpe competed in the Olympic games as an America, representing the United States. In reality, he was considered a ward of the state. He was free to compete and win gold for the United States, but he could not claim American citizenship because the government would not grant it to him, or any other Indigenous people, for many years to come.

Resilience in the Face of Adversity

The character arc for athletes who are the subject of sports biographies often centers on how they manage to overcome insurmountable obstacles to achieve greatness. Resilience in the face of adversity is a mainstay theme of the genre because it shows the protagonist’s determination and character. Sheinkin crafts theme of resilience in Undefeated through many of the book’s key figures and events. Thorpe’s story is, of course, a resilience narrative characterized by the way he never gives up, but also by how he handles the setbacks and adversity that constantly surround him in life. Resilience is not just about “not giving up,” rather, it is about gaining insight into oneself and having the courage to live authentically, even when one is penalized for it. Throughout Undefeated, Thorpe’s story is not just about his personal resilience, but also about the resilience needed to be a high-achieving athlete and a representative of his Indigenous culture in the face of widespread racism.

Sheinkin writes that, “Jim’s first hero was Black Hawk, the famous Sac leader who had led his people in a desperate fight to hold on to their ancestral land in the 1830s,” and that, “Jim grew up hearing stories of Black Hawk, of his legendary feats of running and swimming and wrestling, of his pride and defiance, even in the face of defeat” to make clear that this story does not just belong to Thorpe (12). Thorpe serves as a shining example of the resilience displayed by the Indigenous people of the United States as they worked to survive and retain their cultural values and identities even as the US government continued to strip them of their land and rights.

Other characters in the book embody the resilience theme, but the book’s main concern is comparing and contrasting the kind of resilience Thorpe and the book’s other Indigenous figures need to cultivate versus their white counterparts’ version of resilience. Warner, for instance, is a resilient figure, finding a way to stay close to football and keep his job during a time when football was widely criticized and in danger of being banned. Warner also demonstrates resilience as a coach when he supports his Carlisle Indian School football teams throughout the years. He falls short of the mark, though, compared to Thorpe. Near the book’s end, Sheinkin could have ended the story with the Carlisle Indian School’s football team finally defeating Harvard, but doing so would have covered up the part of the story when Thorpe’s Olympic medals are taken from him after a reporter begins writing stories about Thorpe playing semiprofessional baseball. Instead of defending his star athlete, “Pop Warner called the entire affair a ‘brutal business,’ but he continued to deny any responsibility,” which, “[t]o Jim’s teammates […] was nothing less than a knife to the back” (218).

The narrative’s portrayal of true resilience reaches its climax the moment Warner chooses himself over Thorpe and his team. This makes clear that the book wants its readers to come away from the story understanding that Thorpe and the other Indigenous figures in the narrative needed greater resilience and faced more levels of adversity than Warner and many of the other white figures in the book. Through this comparison, Undefeated emphasizes that, in addition to an individual’s strength of character, the selflessness and communal responsibility demonstrated by the book’s Indigenous figures are necessary to thrive amidst the level of adversity they faced.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 48 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools